hypothesis: if stewardship frame changes how house is treated

• kaeru-chan is used as an inviter to the space
• people sorted into groups + given prompts when he’s picked up(?). include small zine of his story
  • group 1 [no stewardship narrative framing]: thank you for bringing kaeru-chan, look at some of the other places he has been (friend / curiosity / sharing mentality)
  • group 2 [stewardship narrative framing]: bringing kaeru-chan was an act of stewardship already, and now the invite serves as a broader steward to the house (you helped him and he trusts you now as a steward of this house) - add notes here for kaeru-chan’s preferences (or this is his friend’s house)
  • some people (very few) may also come into the house without knowledge of kaeru-chan, we should still ask them if they didn’t bring kaeru-chan
• people stay in house
  • stewardship kpi measurements
    • implant delightful UX things??? accelerometer in paintings (unexpected reward/ sound)
    • fun theory from jane
• people leave house / check out
  • stewardship / post-experiment survey

long time-series, first launch in springtime

next steps [bold = feedback from joe]:

• [jane (lead), michelle + andrej] visual ux journey for guest journey vs not (narrative delivery). right now

  • andrej to also add insights to help
  • [michelle + andrej] experiment design wording (see above)

• [michelle] make frog prototype - hardware

• [michelle + lim + jane(informed)] frog webapp prototype

• [michelle + josh] increase satellite communities

• [josh + jane] letter to houses

• [andrej] post-stewardship survey, feedback

  Post-Stewardship Survey

next next steps